Scarcity vs. Abundance: The Mindset Shift Every Woman in Leadership Needs to Make
Why clinging to power holds you back—and how choosing abundance can transform your leadership.
Leadership is often framed as a competition for limited seats at the table. This “scarcity mindset” assumes there are only so many opportunities to go around, and if someone else wins, you lose. While scarcity thinking might feel protective in high-stakes workplaces, research in organizational psychology shows that it can ultimately sabotage careers, foster toxic environments, and erode trust within teams.¹
By contrast, an “abundance mindset” views leadership as expansive rather than zero-sum. Leaders with abundance believe success multiplies when shared, collaboration strengthens teams, and opportunities grow through generosity, not hoarding.²
For women leaders in particular, the stakes are higher. Because leadership roles for women remain disproportionately scarce—women hold less than a third of executive roles globally³—it is easy to internalize scarcity as the norm. But embracing abundance is not just a mindset shift; it is a strategy for long-term influence and resilience.
Section 1: What Scarcity Mindset Looks Like at Work
Scarcity leadership often masquerades as diligence or competitiveness, but the underlying driver is fear. Instead of focusing on growth, leaders get trapped in defensive behaviors that ultimately limit their effectiveness.
Signs you may be leading with scarcity:
Withholding information. Hoarding insights or updates because you fear others might outshine you.
Reluctance to delegate. Keeping all high-visibility projects for yourself rather than empowering your team.
Over-comparing. Measuring your value constantly against peers rather than your own goals.
Gatekeeping opportunities. Believing there are limited “spots” for women leaders, and competing with rather than sponsoring other women.
Fear of being replaced. Avoiding training successors or mentoring talent because you worry they might outgrow you.
These behaviors are not always intentional. Psychological research shows that scarcity narrows focus, creating “tunnel vision” that prioritizes immediate survival over long-term strategy.⁴ In leadership, this looks like reactive decision-making, mistrust, and chronic stress.
Section 2: The Cost of Scarcity Leadership
Scarcity might feel like vigilance, but over time it erodes both credibility and career momentum. When leaders operate from fear, the collateral damage extends far beyond their own stress levels—it shapes how teams function and how organizations perceive their leadership potential.
1. Burnout Becomes a Leadership Style
Scarcity keeps leaders in constant “hyper-vigilance mode.” Studies show that decision-making under scarcity reduces cognitive bandwidth, leading to fatigue, poor judgment, and higher stress levels.⁵ When leaders model exhaustion as the norm, teams internalize that burnout is part of success, perpetuating a toxic cycle.
Action Step: Audit your calendar weekly. If every hour is filled with urgent tasks, ask yourself: What am I afraid will happen if I delegate or delay? Fear, not necessity, often drives the overload.
2. Team Morale Suffers
Scarcity-based leaders are often seen as unapproachable or unsupportive. Harvard Business Review found that teams led by “information hoarders” reported lower trust and engagement scores.⁶ Employees who feel withheld from opportunities disengage or leave, leading to turnover that damages the leader’s reputation.
Action Step: At your next team meeting, share an opportunity you could have kept for yourself. Invite a direct report to take the lead and publicly endorse them. This builds trust and positions you as a sponsor, not a gatekeeper.
3. Innovation Gets Stifled
Scarcity creates defensiveness, which limits risk-taking. Leaders stuck in protection mode avoid new ideas for fear they might fail—or worse, that someone else’s idea will overshadow theirs. Yet organizational studies show that innovation thrives in high-trust, abundance-oriented environments.⁷
Action Step: Once a quarter, run a “no-fail brainstorm.” Encourage your team to pitch bold, even unrealistic ideas. Frame the session not around feasibility, but around possibility. Abundant leaders protect space for creativity.
4. Reputational Risk Increases
Colleagues can quickly sense scarcity patterns. Leaders who hoard, over-control, or gatekeep are often labeled as “difficult” or “insecure.” In environments where succession and visibility matter, this can cost promotions and sponsorships at the highest levels.
Action Step: Solicit 360-degree feedback from trusted peers or mentors. Ask specifically: Do I come across as collaborative? Am I seen as generous with opportunities? The perception of scarcity can be as damaging as the behavior itself.
Section 3: How Abundance Leadership Works in Practice
If scarcity constrains, abundance liberates. Abundance leadership doesn’t mean ignoring competition or pretending resources are unlimited—it means operating from a mindset that prioritizes growth, collaboration, and long-term impact over short-term control. For high-achieving women, this shift is not only personally sustainable but also professionally strategic.
1. They Share Credit Generously
Leaders who operate from abundance highlight others’ contributions instead of hoarding recognition. Research from Stanford found that teams with leaders who consistently give credit outward had significantly higher trust and productivity levels.⁸ Sharing credit doesn’t diminish authority; it strengthens influence.
Action Step: At the end of each major project, call out one or two people publicly and link their work to the success of the whole. Make it specific (“Her research reframed our client strategy”), not vague (“Great job, everyone”).
2. They Delegate as a Growth Strategy
Abundant leaders view delegation not as loss of control but as an investment in others. Studies show that leaders who delegate effectively free up 20% of their cognitive capacity for strategic thinking and long-term planning.⁹
Action Step: Identify one recurring task that drains you but could stretch a team member’s skills. Delegate it with context: explain why you trust them and how it fits into the bigger picture.
3. They Compete Collaboratively
Abundance reframes competition as co-elevation. Instead of seeing other women as rivals, abundant leaders recognize that collective visibility lifts everyone. Research on women’s leadership networks shows that women with strong peer alliances are 2.5x more likely to be promoted to executive roles.¹⁰
Action Step: Once a month, amplify another woman’s work—whether by making an introduction, endorsing her publicly, or nominating her for an opportunity. It positions you as confident enough to share the spotlight.
4. They Protect Rest and Renewal
An abundant mindset recognizes that energy is a resource worth guarding. Leaders who integrate rest into their strategy outperform those who overwork, as cognitive recovery directly correlates with sharper problem-solving and emotional regulation.¹¹
Action Step: Treat recovery like a deliverable. Block time in your calendar for reflection, exercise, or even unstructured thinking. When challenged, frame it as “maintaining peak performance,” not “taking a break.”
5. They Build Systems for Others to Thrive
Abundance scales impact. Leaders who create systems—clear expectations, feedback channels, documented processes—don’t just manage; they multiply success. Studies show that leaders who institutionalize abundance practices build more resilient teams that thrive even in their absence.¹²
Action Step: Each quarter, audit one process your team relies on. Ask: If I left tomorrow, would this still run smoothly? Abundant leaders build legacies, not dependencies.
Section 4: Recognizing Scarcity Triggers (and Resetting in Real Time)
Even the most intentional leaders aren’t immune to scarcity triggers. Workplace dynamics—competition for promotions, budget cuts, or sudden leadership shifts—can activate old patterns of defensiveness or control. What sets abundant leaders apart is their ability to notice these triggers quickly and reset before they calcify into damaging behaviors.
1. Trigger: Feeling Threatened by Another’s Success
When a colleague is promoted, praised, or given visibility, scarcity whispers, “There’s less room for you.” But research shows that industries with more women at senior levels have stronger pipelines for advancement overall.¹³ One woman’s success can expand opportunities for others, not shrink them.
Reset: Pause before reacting. Ask: What does her success make possible for me or others? Use it as a chance to build an ally, not a competitor.
2. Trigger: Protecting Information Instead of Sharing It
In environments with scarce resources, leaders sometimes withhold knowledge to maintain leverage. Studies on knowledge hoarding link it to lower team performance and increased turnover.¹⁴
Reset: Flip the script by sharing strategically. Before a big meeting, share a preview of your thinking with your team. Position yourself as a hub, not a gatekeeper.
3. Trigger: Over-Scheduling and Overworking
Scarcity convinces us that working longer equals being indispensable. Yet research shows that productivity plateaus after ~50 hours per week, with steep declines beyond that.¹⁵
Reset: When tempted to add another late night, ask: Is this task truly high-value? Or is it fear of falling behind? Abundance leaders prioritize outputs, not optics.
4. Trigger: Defensiveness in Feedback Conversations
Scarcity interprets feedback as threat instead of growth. But leaders who actively seek feedback are rated as significantly more effective by their teams.¹⁶
Reset: When receiving feedback, resist the urge to explain or justify. Instead, respond with: “Thank you—that gives me a clearer picture.” Then pause and reflect before acting.
5. Trigger: Micromanaging Under Pressure
Scarcity thrives in uncertainty, leading leaders to tighten control. Micromanagement, however, undermines trust and reduces innovation.¹⁷
Reset: Instead of asking “How’s it going?” every hour, shift to “What support do you need from me to move this forward?” Abundance replaces control with enablement.
Section 5: Daily Practices for Cultivating Abundance Leadership
Awareness of scarcity triggers is essential, but lasting change requires habits that reinforce abundance as a leadership identity. These daily practices are less about grand gestures and more about intentional micro-actions that shift culture and protect your own well-being.
1. Start Each Day with Clarity, Not Urgency
Abundance leaders resist beginning their day in reactivity. Studies on decision fatigue show that early-morning focus significantly impacts the quality of choices later in the day.¹⁸
Practice: Spend the first 10 minutes setting three priorities (not 20) that align with strategy, not just noise. Use a phrase like: “If nothing else gets done today, accomplishing these three things will move us forward.”
2. Protect White Space on Your Calendar
Scarcity fills every gap with meetings, emails, or “urgent” tasks. Abundance leaders intentionally schedule time for thinking and reflection—a proven driver of creativity and problem-solving.¹⁹
Practice: Block at least one hour a week labeled “strategic time.” Defend it as fiercely as any meeting. Over time, teams mirror this behavior, normalizing space for higher-order thinking.
3. Celebrate Small Wins Publicly
Neuroscience research shows that recognition activates reward pathways in the brain, reinforcing motivation and resilience.²⁰ Scarcity overlooks wins, waiting for the “big one.”
Practice: End weekly meetings by naming three micro-victories from your team. Frame them as collective achievements (“We moved the needle on…”), not just individual, to reinforce collaboration over competition.
4. Invest in Cross-Functional Relationships
Abundance leaders see influence not as a zero-sum game but as a web of allies. Research on organizational networks shows that leaders with diverse ties across silos are more innovative and resilient.²¹
Practice: Once a month, reach out to a colleague outside your immediate function for a 20-minute “curiosity coffee.” Use these touchpoints to exchange insights, not favors.
5. Close the Day with Detachment, Not Carryover
Scarcity extends the workday indefinitely, bleeding into evenings. Leaders who practice psychological detachment from work report higher energy, less burnout, and stronger job performance the next day.²²
Practice: End your day by writing down three accomplishments and one thing to prioritize tomorrow. Then deliberately switch environments (e.g., step outside, change clothes) to signal closure.
Section 6: Leading with Abundance in the Long Game
Shifting from scarcity to abundance isn’t a quick mindset hack—it’s a long-game strategy that transforms not only how you lead but how your organization operates. Leaders who consistently cultivate abundance develop resilience, attract top talent, and build environments where innovation can thrive, even under external constraints.
1. Redefining Constraints as Strategic Filters
Abundance doesn’t ignore limitations—it reframes them. Research on adaptive leadership shows that high-performing organizations treat constraints as opportunities to sharpen focus and spark creativity rather than as threats.²³
Practice: When resources feel limited, ask: “What would this constraint force us to do better?” This shift trains your team to see challenges as a design prompt, not a dead end.
2. Building Cultures of Psychological Safety
Abundance is contagious—but so is scarcity. Teams in scarcity-driven cultures often become risk-averse, siloed, and defensive. Conversely, studies on psychological safety (Edmondson, 1999) show that cultures where employees feel safe to speak up and make mistakes outperform competitors on innovation and retention.²⁴
Practice: Normalize vulnerability by sharing lessons from your own mistakes in leadership meetings. Model that missteps are not career-ending but data for improvement.
3. Future-Proofing Through Generosity
Abundance-oriented leaders see mentorship and sponsorship not as distractions but as multipliers. Research shows that organizations where leaders actively mentor are 23% more likely to retain high-potential employees and have stronger pipelines for succession.²⁵
Practice: Formalize one way you “give forward”—whether that’s committing to quarterly mentorship sessions, sponsoring someone for a stretch project, or creating a team ritual that passes opportunities across levels.
4. Anchoring Success in Shared Wins, Not Individual Glory
Scarcity isolates leaders. Abundance weaves a collective narrative. Over time, this storytelling reinforces a culture where people feel they’re building something bigger than themselves.²⁶
Practice: Reframe team updates and performance reviews around impact statements (“This project increased access to…”), not just individual outputs. This narrative cements the value of collaboration in the long game.
5. Sustaining Abundance Through Renewal
Finally, leaders can’t champion abundance if they’re operating on empty. Longitudinal research confirms that leaders who practice renewal—rest, reflection, and non-work pursuits—show higher creativity and team engagement scores than those who don’t.²⁷
Practice: Build renewal into your annual leadership plan with the same rigor you apply to budget cycles. That might mean quarterly retreats (solo or with peers), scheduled sabbaticals, or protected “off-grid” weekends.
Final Thoughts
Scarcity mindset is seductive—it masquerades as caution, rigor, or even loyalty to your team. But left unchecked, it constrains leadership potential and corrodes workplace culture. Abundance, by contrast, is a deliberate practice: reframing constraints, investing in people, and building systems that multiply rather than diminish resources.
Leaders who choose abundance don’t just avoid burnout—they architect environments where others can thrive, too. And in the long game of leadership, that is the legacy that endures.
-
Grant, A. (2013). Give and Take: A Revolutionary Approach to Success. Viking.
Covey, S. R. (1989). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Free Press.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much. Times Books.
Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2012). “Some Consequences of Having Too Little.” Science, 338(6107), 682–685.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). “The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). “A Theory of Human Motivation.” Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). “Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress.” American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). “The Role of Positive Emotions in Positive Psychology: The Broaden-and-Build Theory of Positive Emotions.” American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being.” American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). “Grit: Perseverance and Passion for Long-Term Goals.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. Free Press.
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge. Oxford University Press.
Boyatzis, R. E., & McKee, A. (2005). Resonant Leadership: Renewing Yourself and Connecting with Others Through Mindfulness, Hope, and Compassion. Harvard Business School Press.
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The Leadership Challenge. 6th ed. Wiley.
Spreitzer, G., & Sonenshein, S. (2004). “Toward the Construct Definition of Positive Deviance.” Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 703–719.
Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The Practice of Adaptive Leadership. Harvard Business Press.
Brown, B. (2012). Daring Greatly: How the Courage to Be Vulnerable Transforms the Way We Live, Love, Parent, and Lead. Gotham Books.
Cameron, K. (2012). Positive Leadership: Strategies for Extraordinary Performance. Berrett-Koehler.
Quinn, R. E. (2004). Building the Bridge as You Walk on It: A Guide for Leading Change. Jossey-Bass.
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). “Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting Leadership from the Industrial Age to the Knowledge Era.” The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318.
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). “Psychological Safety: The History, Renaissance, and Future of an Interpersonal Construct.” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 23–43.
Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E., & Lima, L. (2004). “Career Benefits Associated with Mentoring for Protégés: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 127–136.
Denning, S. (2005). The Leader’s Guide to Storytelling: Mastering the Art and Discipline of Business Narrative. Jossey-Bass.
Fritz, C., & Sonnentag, S. (2005). “Recovery, Health, and Job Performance: Effects of Weekend Experiences.” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(3), 187–199.
